Team:Amplino/Safety

From 2012e.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 7: Line 7:
       </strong>
       </strong>
       <ul>
       <ul>
-
         <li> researcher safety: when working with possible parasitic infected blood, one must take safety procedures into account. </li>
+
         <li> researcher safety: when working with possible infected blood, one must take safety procedures into account. </li>
         <li> public safety:  </li>
         <li> public safety:  </li>
         <li> environmental safety? </li>
         <li> environmental safety? </li>

Revision as of 11:02, 21 October 2012

  1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:
    • researcher safety: when working with possible infected blood, one must take safety procedures into account.
    • public safety:
    • environmental safety?
  2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,
    • did you document these issues in the Registry?
    • how did you manage to handle the safety issue?
    • How could other teams learn from your experience?
  3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
    • If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?
    • If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country?
  4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?