Judging

From 2012e.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
m (Created page with "The judging criteria are still being determined. Please check back soon.")
Line 1: Line 1:
-
The judging criteria are still being determined. Please check back soon.
+
The judging criteria are still being determined.
 +
 
 +
<li id='igem_title'>Project Documentation: </li>
 +
<p>However, every team submission must be documented on the iGEM Wiki, including but not limited to a public executive summary, elevator pitch (max 3 min) video, and public presentation (Slides).  
 +
<ul>
 +
<li><span  id='li_heading'>Wiki:</span> You have the freedom to be creative, but a few specific rules apply, and generally follow the collegiate iGEM Wiki requirements. See the <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Requirements/Wiki">wiki requirements</a>.</li>
 +
<li><span  id='li_heading'>Business Plan Wiki:</span> Successful business plan submissions probably include sections that show:</li>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>* The problem or opportunity being addressed. </li>
 +
<li>* Details of the solution being proposed.</li>
 +
<li>* The competitive landscape.</li>
 +
<li>* Skillsets of the founding team and early employees and collaborators required.</li>
 +
<li>* Information about the team.</li>
 +
<li>* The team's competitive advantage.</li>
 +
<li>* Proposed milestones.</li>
 +
<li>* Business model.</li>
 +
<li>* Funding requirements tied to milestones.</li>
 +
<li>* Potential Risks.</li>
 +
<li>* Actions suggested to mitigate risks.</li>
 +
<li>* Attribution of work to team members, advisors, and others.</li>
 +
<li>* If seeking investment, exit scenarios and appropropriately discounted yield calculations.</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
</li>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<li><span  id='li_heading'>Other Track Wikis:</span> The Wiki for the submissions must at least include sections that show:</li>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>The problem or opportunity being addressed. </li>
 +
<li>Details of the solution being proposed.</li>
 +
<li>Comparison of alternative solutions.</li>
 +
<li>Stakeholder maps and actions required to reach them.</li>
 +
<li>Proposed milestones.</li>
 +
<li>Potential Risks.</li>
 +
<li>Actions suggested to mitigate risks.</li>
 +
<li>Attribution of work to team members, advisors, and others.</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
</li>
 +
</ul>

Revision as of 21:53, 31 January 2012

The judging criteria are still being determined.

  • Project Documentation: </li>

    However, every team submission must be documented on the iGEM Wiki, including but not limited to a public executive summary, elevator pitch (max 3 min) video, and public presentation (Slides).

    • Wiki: You have the freedom to be creative, but a few specific rules apply, and generally follow the collegiate iGEM Wiki requirements. See the <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Requirements/Wiki">wiki requirements</a>.
    • Business Plan Wiki: Successful business plan submissions probably include sections that show:
      • * The problem or opportunity being addressed.
      • * Details of the solution being proposed.
      • * The competitive landscape.
      • * Skillsets of the founding team and early employees and collaborators required.
      • * Information about the team.
      • * The team's competitive advantage.
      • * Proposed milestones.
      • * Business model.
      • * Funding requirements tied to milestones.
      • * Potential Risks.
      • * Actions suggested to mitigate risks.
      • * Attribution of work to team members, advisors, and others.
      • * If seeking investment, exit scenarios and appropropriately discounted yield calculations.


    • Other Track Wikis: The Wiki for the submissions must at least include sections that show:
      • The problem or opportunity being addressed.
      • Details of the solution being proposed.
      • Comparison of alternative solutions.
      • Stakeholder maps and actions required to reach them.
      • Proposed milestones.
      • Potential Risks.
      • Actions suggested to mitigate risks.
      • Attribution of work to team members, advisors, and others.