Judging

From 2012e.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
The judging criteria are still being determined.
The judging criteria are still being determined.
-
<li id='igem_title'>Project Documentation: </li>
+
<b>Project Documentation: </b>
<p>However, every team submission must be documented on the iGEM Wiki, including but not limited to a public executive summary, elevator pitch (max 3 min) video, and public presentation (Slides).  
<p>However, every team submission must be documented on the iGEM Wiki, including but not limited to a public executive summary, elevator pitch (max 3 min) video, and public presentation (Slides).  
<ul>
<ul>

Revision as of 21:54, 31 January 2012

The judging criteria are still being determined.

Project Documentation:

However, every team submission must be documented on the iGEM Wiki, including but not limited to a public executive summary, elevator pitch (max 3 min) video, and public presentation (Slides).

  • Wiki: You have the freedom to be creative, but a few specific rules apply, and generally follow the collegiate iGEM Wiki requirements. See the <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Requirements/Wiki">wiki requirements</a>.
  • Business Plan Wiki: Successful business plan submissions probably include sections that show:
    • * The problem or opportunity being addressed.
    • * Details of the solution being proposed.
    • * The competitive landscape.
    • * Skillsets of the founding team and early employees and collaborators required.
    • * Information about the team.
    • * The team's competitive advantage.
    • * Proposed milestones.
    • * Business model.
    • * Funding requirements tied to milestones.
    • * Potential Risks.
    • * Actions suggested to mitigate risks.
    • * Attribution of work to team members, advisors, and others.
    • * If seeking investment, exit scenarios and appropropriately discounted yield calculations.


  • Other Track Wikis: The Wiki for the submissions must at least include sections that show:
    • The problem or opportunity being addressed.
    • Details of the solution being proposed.
    • Comparison of alternative solutions.
    • Stakeholder maps and actions required to reach them.
    • Proposed milestones.
    • Potential Risks.
    • Actions suggested to mitigate risks.
    • Attribution of work to team members, advisors, and others.